Huawei P8 lite (2017) Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)

Huawei P8 lite (2017) vs Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)

Huawei P8 lite (2017)

Reasons to consider the P8 lite (2017)

Compass Integrated compass Yes vs No Map and navigation apps know which direction you're facing even when you're standing still
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen 1,920x1,080 vs 1,280x720 Around 2.5x higher resolution screen
Processor Significantly faster processor Unknown, 2100 MHz vs Unknown, 1200 MHz More powerful processor, snappier and more responsive (around 80% faster)
Screen PPI Significantly higher PPI screen 423 PPI vs 282 PPI 50% crisper display of text, images and video
Weight Slightly lighter 147 g vs 158 g Around 10% lighter
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)

Reasons to consider the Galaxy J5 (2016)

Camera resolution Slightly higher resolution camera 13 MP vs 12 MP Take photos with around 10% more detail for larger prints


Common Pros and Cons

Compared to recent cellphones

Pros Cons
Camera resolution Capture extremely high resolution images
P8 lite (2017)12 MP
Galaxy J5 (2016)13 MP
Thickness Thin
8 mm
Screen size Large screens
Screen resolution High resolution screens
P8 lite (2017)1,920x1,080
Galaxy J5 (2016)1,280x720
Screen PPI Sharp display of text, images and video
P8 lite (2017)423 PPI
Galaxy J5 (2016)282 PPI
Multi-touch Both support multi-touch
Intuitive gestures such as pinch to zoom
Touchscreen type Touch sensitive screens
Easy to use with your fingers
Wifi Both have fairly fast wifi support
802.11n (150 mbps)
FM Radio Both have built-in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations
Listen to music from your favorite stations
compatibility-score Works with many headphones
Bluetooth Not the latest bluetooth support
GPS Lack assisted GPS

Compared to recent smartphones

Pros Cons

We're not aware of any interesting pros shared by these two products.

We're not aware of any interesting cons shared by these two products.


Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) Huawei P8 lite (2017)


Which phone do you like, and why?

Showing 0 comments