vs
Nokia 700 Nokia 600

Nokia 700 vs Nokia 600

Mobile speed test
Nokia 700

Reasons to consider the 700

3.5G, Nokia Symbian Belle
Thickness Thinner 10 mm vs 14 mm More than 30% thinner
Processor Faster processor Arm Arm11, 1300 MHz vs Arm Arm11, 1000 MHz More powerful processor, snappier and more responsive (30% faster)
Size Smaller 50x110x9 mm vs 53x111x14 mm Around 40% smaller
Nokia 600

Reasons to consider the 600

3.5G, symbian
Talk time Much more talk time 15 hours vs 7.2 hours More than 2x more talk time per battery charge
Standby time More standby time 22.5 days vs 19.4 days Around 20% more standby time, less frequent charging

Competitors

Nokia 700 Sony Ericsson W995 700 vs W995
Nokia 700 Sony Ericsson Xperia ray 700 vs Xperia ray
Nokia 700 Samsung Galaxy S II 700 vs Galaxy S II
Nokia Lumia 620 Nokia 700 700 vs Lumia 620
Nokia 600 Sony Ericsson Xperia mini 600 vs Xperia mini
Placeholder Nokia 600 600 vs Asha 303
Nokia 603 Nokia 600 600 vs 603
Nokia Lumia 610 Nokia 600 600 vs Lumia 610

Common Pros and Cons

Compared to recent cellphones

Pros Cons
Bluetooth The latest bluetooth support
3.0
Multi-touch Both support multi-touch
Intuitive gestures such as pinch to zoom
Camera resolution Capture very high resolution images
5 MP
GPS Have assisted GPS
Assisted GPS
Wifi Both have fairly fast wifi support
802.11n (150 mbps)
Screen PPI Sharp display of text, images and video
228 PPI
Touchscreen type Touch sensitive screens
Easy to use with your fingers
Standby time Long standby time
700:19.4 days
600:22.5 days
compatibility-score Works with many headphones
1.0
App store Both have an app store, makes it easy to add new games and programs
Easily get games and programs for your phone
App store App store(s) have fewer apps than some
Nokia Ovi Store
Numeric keypad Neither has a numeric keypad
Its often harder to dial numbers with a touch screen or keyboard

Appearance

Nokia 700 Nokia 600 Nokia 700 Nokia 600 Nokia 700 Nokia 600

Comments

Which phone do you like, and why?

Showing 0 comments