vs
Placeholder Nokia C3

Nokia C2-02 vs Nokia C3

Placeholder

Reasons to consider the C2-02

2.5G
Numeric keypad Has a numeric keypad Physical numeric keypad vs None Numeric keypads make dialing phone numbers fast and easy
Standby time More standby time 25 days vs 20 days Around 30% more standby time, less frequent charging
Nokia C3

Reasons to consider the C3

2.5G
Keyboard Has a full keyboard QWERTY keyboard vs None A physical keyboard is great for emailing and typing in general
Screen type Bright, vivid screen TFT LCD vs LCD Brighter and more vivid colour reproduction
Thickness Thinner 14 mm vs 17 mm 20% thinner
Screen PPI Slightly higher PPI screen 166 PPI vs 153 PPI Around 10% crisper display of text, images and video

Competitors

Motorola Moto G Placeholder C2-02 vs Moto G
Samsung Galaxy Y Placeholder C2-02 vs Galaxy Y
LG Optimus L3 Placeholder C2-02 vs Optimus L3
LG Optimus L3 II Placeholder C2-02 vs Optimus L3 II
Nokia Asha 210 Nokia C3 C3 vs Asha 210
Samsung GALAXY mini Nokia C3 C3 vs GALAXY mini
Nokia E5 Nokia C3 C3 vs E5
Samsung Galaxy Y Nokia C3 C3 vs Galaxy Y

Common Pros and Cons

Compared to recent cellphones

Pros Cons
compatibility-score Works with many headphones
1.0
Movie format Poor movies
C2-02:176 x 144 @ 15fps
C3:320 x 240 @ 20fps

Appearance

Placeholder Nokia C3

Comments

Which phone do you like, and why?

Showing 0 comments