vs
RIM Blackberry Curve 9320 Placeholder

RIM Blackberry Curve 9320 vs Nokia Asha 303

RIM Blackberry Curve 9320

Reasons to consider the Blackberry Curve 9320

3.5G, RIM BlackBerry OS 7.0
Screen type Bright, vivid screen TFT LCD vs LCD Brighter and more vivid colour reproduction
Numeric keypad Has a numeric keypad Physical numeric keypad vs None Almost the same
Thickness Slightly thinner 13 mm vs 14 mm Around 10% thinner
Size Slightly smaller 60×109×13 mm vs 56×117×14 mm Around 10% smaller
Screen PPI Slightly higher PPI screen 163 PPI vs 153 PPI Around 10% crisper display of text, images and video
Placeholder

Reasons to consider the Asha 303

3.5G
Touchscreen Has a touchscreen Capacitive vs None Almost the same
Standby time More standby time 30.5 days vs 18 days Around 70% more standby time, less frequent charging
Network Slightly faster max data speeds HSDPA (10.2 mbps) vs HSDPA (7.2 mbps) Higher theoretical max data transfer speeds over cell networks (more than 40% faster)

Competitors

Common Pros and Cons

Compared to recent cellphones

Pros Cons
Keyboard Have full keyboards
QWERTY keyboard
Wifi Both have fairly fast wifi support
802.11n (150 mbps)
FM Radio Both have built-in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations
Listen to music from your favorite stations
compatibility-score Works with many headphones
1.0
Movie format Standard resolution video
9320480p @ 30fps
Asha 303480p @ 15fps

Appearance

Placeholder RIM Blackberry Curve 9320

Comments

Which phone do you like, and why?

Showing 0 comments