vs
RIM Blackberry Curve 9320 Placeholder

RIM Blackberry Curve 9320 vs Nokia Asha 303

RIM Blackberry Curve 9320

Reasons to consider the Blackberry Curve 9320

3.5G, RIM BlackBerry OS 7.0
Screen type Bright, vivid screen TFT LCD vs LCD Brighter and more vivid colour reproduction
Numeric keypad Has a numeric keypad Physical numeric keypad vs None Numeric keypads make dialing phone numbers fast and easy
Thickness Slightly thinner 13 mm vs 14 mm Around 10% thinner
Screen PPI Slightly higher PPI screen 163 PPI vs 153 PPI Around 10% crisper display of text, images and video
Size Slightly smaller 60x109x12 mm vs 55x116x13 mm Around 10% smaller
Placeholder

Reasons to consider the Asha 303

3.5G
Touchscreen Has a touchscreen Capacitive vs None Interact with the phone quickly and naturally with your fingers
Standby time More standby time 30.5 days vs 18 days Around 70% more standby time, less frequent charging
Network Slightly faster max data speeds HSDPA (10.2 mbps) vs HSDPA (7.2 mbps) Higher theoretical max data transfer speeds over cell networks (more than 40% faster)

Competitors

BlackBerry 9720 RIM Blackberry Curve 9320 Blackberry Curve 9320 vs 9720
RIM Blackberry Curve 9320 RIM BlackBerry Bold 9780 Blackberry Curve 9320 vs BlackBerry Bold 9780
BlackBerry Q5 RIM Blackberry Curve 9320 Blackberry Curve 9320 vs Q5
Nokia Lumia 520 RIM Blackberry Curve 9320 Blackberry Curve 9320 vs Lumia 520
Placeholder Nokia C3 Asha 303 vs C3
Placeholder Nokia E6 Asha 303 vs E6
Sony Xperia tipo Placeholder Asha 303 vs Xperia tipo
Nokia Asha 210 Placeholder Asha 303 vs Asha 210

Common Pros and Cons

Compared to recent cellphones

Pros Cons
Keyboard Have full keyboards
QWERTY keyboard
Wifi Both have fairly fast wifi support
802.11n (150 mbps)
compatibility-score Works with many headphones
1.0
Movie format Standard resolution video
9320:480p @ 30fps
Asha 303:480p @ 15fps

Appearance

RIM Blackberry Curve 9320 Placeholder

Comments

Which phone do you like, and why?

Showing 0 comments