vs
Samsung ATIV S Neo Samsung Galaxy S 4G

Samsung ATIV S Neo vs Samsung Galaxy S 4G

Samsung ATIV S Neo

Reasons to consider the ATIV S Neo

4G, Microsoft Windows Phone 8
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen 1280x720 vs 800x480 Around 2.5x higher resolution screen
Internal storage Significantly more internal storage 16 GB vs 1000 MB Around 16.5x more internal storage, which means more music, photos and movies
Movie format Higher resolution movies 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps Shoots higher resolution Full HD (1080p) video
Screen PPI Higher PPI screen 305 PPI vs 232 PPI More than 30% crisper display of text, images and video
Camera resolution Higher resolution camera 8 MP vs 5 MP Take photos with 60% more detail for larger prints
Processor Faster processor Unknown, 1400 MHz vs Samsung Hummingbird, 1000 MHz More powerful processor, snappier and more responsive (40% faster)
Network Faster max data speeds LTE (80 mbps) vs HSDPA (7.2 mbps) Higher theoretical max data transfer speeds over cell networks (around 3x faster)
Screen size Larger screen 4.8" vs 4.0" Around 40% larger screen
Thickness Slightly thinner 9 mm vs 10 mm Around 10% thinner
Samsung Galaxy S 4G

Reasons to consider the Galaxy S 4G

3.5G, Google Android 2.3 (Gingerbread)
Compass Integrated compass Yes vs No Map and navigation apps know which direction you're facing even when you're standing still
Wifi Much faster wifi 802.11n (150 mbps) vs 802.11 (0 mbps) Almost the same
Bluetooth Much newer bluetooth support 3.0 vs 1.0 Typically faster data transfer and lower power consumption connecting to other bluetooth devices
App store Many more apps available Android App Market vs Windows Phone Marketplace The Android App Market has over 400,000 apps vs 55,000 (around 7.5x more)
Screen type OLED screen Super AMOLED vs TFT LCD The Galaxy S 4G has a OLED screen, which are generally brighter and more vivid
Weight Lighter 118 g vs 144 g Around 20% lighter
Size Slightly smaller 65x122x10 mm vs 69x135x9 mm Around 10% smaller

Competitors

Samsung ATIV S Neo Nokia Lumia 925 ATIV S Neo vs Lumia 925
Samsung ATIV S Neo LG Optimus G Pro ATIV S Neo vs Optimus G Pro
Samsung ATIV S Neo Nokia Lumia 625 ATIV S Neo vs Lumia 625
Samsung ATIV S Neo Samsung ATIV S ATIV S Neo vs ATIV S
Samsung Galaxy S 4G Samsung Galaxy 5 Galaxy S 4G vs Galaxy 5
Apple iPhone 5s 16GB Samsung Galaxy S 4G Galaxy S 4G vs iPhone 5s
Nokia Lumia 1020 Samsung Galaxy S 4G Galaxy S 4G vs Lumia 1020
Samsung Galaxy S 4G Apple iPhone 4 Galaxy S 4G vs iPhone 4

Common Pros and Cons

Compared to recent cellphones

Pros Cons
Thickness Thin
ATIV S Neo:9 mm
Galaxy S 4G:10 mm
Multi-touch Both support multi-touch
Intuitive gestures such as pinch to zoom
GPS Have assisted GPS
Assisted GPS
Touchscreen type Touch sensitive screens
Easy to use with your fingers
Screen PPI Sharp display of text, images and video
ATIV S Neo:305 PPI
Galaxy S 4G:232 PPI
Camera resolution Capture very high resolution images
ATIV S Neo:8 MP
Galaxy S 4G:5 MP
Screen resolution High resolution screens
ATIV S Neo:1280x720
Galaxy S 4G:800x480
compatibility-score Works with many headphones
1.0
App store Both have an app store, makes it easy to add new games and programs
ATIV S Neo:Windows Phone Marketplace
Galaxy S 4G:Android App Market
FM Radio Neither have built in FM Radios
Won't pick up any radio stations
Numeric keypad Neither has a numeric keypad
Its often harder to dial numbers with a touch screen or keyboard

Compared to recent smartphones

Pros Cons
Accelerometer Both include an accelerometer
Detects movement for interactive apps
Keyboard Neither has a physical keyboard
No keyboard

Appearance

Samsung ATIV S Neo Samsung Galaxy S 4G Samsung Galaxy S 4G Samsung Galaxy S 4G

Comments

Which phone do you like, and why?

Showing 0 comments