vs
Placeholder Samsung Corby S3650

Samsung Corby II vs Samsung Corby S3650

Mobile speed test
Placeholder

Reasons to consider the Corby II

2.5G
Bluetooth Significantly newer bluetooth support 3.0 vs 2.1 Typically faster data transfer and lower power consumption connecting to other bluetooth devices
Screen size Slightly larger screen 3.1" vs 2.8" Around 30% larger screen
Talk time Slightly more talk time 9.5 hours vs 9 hours Around 10% more talk time per battery charge
Samsung Corby S3650

Reasons to consider the Corby S3650

2.5G
Standby time More standby time 30.4 days vs 25.8 days Around 20% more standby time, less frequent charging
Screen PPI Slightly higher PPI screen 142 PPI vs 127 PPI More than 10% crisper display of text, images and video
Size Slightly smaller 56x103x12 mm vs 60x109x11 mm More than 10% smaller
Weight Slightly lighter 93 g vs 102 g Around 10% lighter

Competitors

Samsung Galaxy Y Placeholder Corby II vs Galaxy Y
Placeholder Samsung GALAXY mini Corby II vs GALAXY mini
Placeholder Nokia C3 Corby II vs C3
Placeholder Samsung Champ Corby II vs Champ
Samsung GALAXY mini Samsung Corby S3650 Corby S3650 vs GALAXY mini
Samsung Galaxy Y Samsung Corby S3650 Corby S3650 vs Galaxy Y
HTC Explorer Samsung Corby S3650 Corby S3650 vs Explorer
Samsung Galaxy Ace Samsung Corby S3650 Corby S3650 vs Galaxy Ace

Common Pros and Cons

Compared to recent cellphones

Pros Cons
Standby time Very long standby time
Corby II:25.8 days
Corby S3650:30.4 days
Talk time Long talk time
Corby II:9.5 hours
Corby S3650:9 hours
Touchscreen type Touch sensitive screens
Easy to use with your fingers
Thickness Thin
12 mm
Multi-touch Neither supports multi-touch
Only one finger at a time on the touchscreen
Screen PPI Lower quality display of text, images and video
Corby II:127 PPI
Corby S3650:142 PPI

Appearance

Placeholder Samsung Corby S3650

Comments

Which phone do you like, and why?

Showing 1 comments

aiz (6:34 PM, December 27, 2011)
wtf, thats not the corby2. its not even qwerty type. are you ok????  duh.