vs
Placeholder Placeholder

Samsung Galaxy Ace vs Samsung Galaxy 5

Placeholder

Reasons to consider the Galaxy Ace

3.5G, Google Android 2.3 (Gingerbread)
Multi-touch Suports multi-touch Yes vs No Use intuitive gestures such as pinch to zoom
Wifi Significantly faster wifi 802.11n (150 mbps) vs 802.11g (54 mbps) Higher bandwidth streaming at hotspots (around 3x faster)
Camera resolution Higher resolution camera 5 MP vs 2 MP Take photos with 2.5x more detail for larger prints
Standby time More standby time 26.7 days vs 21.7 days More than 20% more standby time, less frequent charging
Processor Faster processor Unknown, 800 MHz vs Arm Arm11, 600 MHz More powerful processor, snappier and more responsive (more than 30% faster)
Screen size Larger screen 3.5"" vs 2.8"" More than 50% larger screen
Screen PPI Slightly higher PPI screen 164 PPI vs 142 PPI Around 20% crisper display of text, images and video
Thickness Slightly thinner 12 mm vs 12 mm Around 10% thinner
Talk time Slightly more talk time 11.2 hours vs 8.7 hours Around 30% more talk time per battery charge
Screen resolution Slightly higher resolution screen 480x320 vs 320x240 2x higher resolution screen
Placeholder

Reasons to consider the Galaxy 5

3.5G, Google Android 2.2 (Froyo)
Bluetooth Newer bluetooth support 3.0 vs 2.1 Typically faster data transfer and lower power consumption connecting to other bluetooth devices
Weight Slightly lighter 102 g vs 113 g Around 10% lighter

Competitors

Common Pros and Cons

Compared to recent cellphones

Pros Cons
GPS Have assisted GPS
Assisted GPS
Touchscreen type Touch sensitive screens
Easy to use with your fingers
FM Radio Both have built-in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations
Listen to music from your favorite stations
Standby time Long standby time
Galaxy Ace26.7 days
Galaxy 521.7 days
compatibility-score Works with many headphones
1.0
Thickness Thin
12 mm
Numeric keypad Neither has a numeric keypad
Its often harder to dial numbers with a touch screen or keyboard
Movie format Low resolution video
Galaxy Ace320 x 240 @ 20fps
Galaxy 5320 x 240 @ 15fps
Processor Less powerful processors than average, less snapiness and responsiveness
Galaxy AceUnknown, 800 MHz
Galaxy 5Arm Arm11, 600 MHz

Compared to recent smartphones

Pros Cons

We're not aware of any interesting pros shared by these two products.

Screen PPI Lower quality display of text, images and video
Galaxy Ace164 PPI
Galaxy 5142 PPI
Screen resolution Low resolution screens
Galaxy Ace480x320
Galaxy 5320x240
Internal storage Less internal storage than average for storing music, photos and movies
Galaxy Ace158 MB
Galaxy 5100 MB
Keyboard Neither has a physical keyboard
No keyboard
Camera resolution Capture low resolution images
Galaxy Ace5 MP
Galaxy 52 MP

Appearance

Placeholder Placeholder

Comments

Which phone do you like, and why?

Showing 0 comments