Samsung Galaxy Proclaim Huawei Ascend II

Samsung Galaxy Proclaim vs Huawei Ascend II

Samsung Galaxy Proclaim

Reasons to consider the Galaxy Proclaim

3G, Google Android 2.3 (Gingerbread)
Processor Faster processor Unknown, 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz, 600 MHz More powerful processor, snappier and more responsive (around 70% faster)
Thickness Slightly thinner 11 mm vs 13 mm More than 10% thinner
Standby time Slightly more standby time 16 days vs 12.5 days Around 30% more standby time, less frequent charging
Size Slightly smaller 60×114×11 mm vs 61×117×13 mm Around 20% smaller
Huawei Ascend II

Reasons to consider the Ascend II

3G, Google Android 2.3 (Gingerbread)
Bluetooth Newer bluetooth support 2.1 vs 1.0 Typically faster data transfer and lower power consumption connecting to other bluetooth devices
Camera resolution Higher resolution camera 5 MP vs 3 MP Take photos with around 70% more detail for larger prints
Network Slightly faster max data speeds 1xEV-DO rev. A (3.1 mbps) vs cdma2000 (0.153 mbps) Higher theoretical max data transfer speeds over cell networks (around 20.5x faster)


Common Pros and Cons

Compared to recent cellphones

Pros Cons
Touchscreen type Touch sensitive screens
Easy to use with your fingers
compatibility-score Works with many headphones

We're not aware of any interesting cons shared by these two products.

Compared to recent smartphones

Pros Cons
App store Both have an app store, makes it easy to add new games and programs
Easily get games and programs for your phone
Screen PPI Lower quality display of text, images and video
164 PPI
Screen resolution Low resolution screens
Internal storage Less internal storage than average for storing music, photos and movies
Galaxy Proclaim1 GB
Ascend II512 MB
Network Slower data transfer than average
Galaxy Proclaimcdma2000 (0.153 mbps)
Ascend II1xEV-DO rev. A (3.1 mbps)
Bluetooth Not the latest bluetooth support
Galaxy Proclaim1.0
Ascend II2.1


Samsung Galaxy Proclaim Huawei Ascend II Samsung Galaxy Proclaim Huawei Ascend II


Which phone do you like, and why?

Showing 0 comments