vs
Samsung Galaxy S II Nokia 6280

Samsung Galaxy S II vs Nokia 6280

Samsung Galaxy S II

Reasons to consider the Galaxy S II

3.5G, Android-2.3.4
Screen type OLED screen Super AMOLED Plus vs TFT LCD The S II has a OLED screen, which are generally brighter and more vivid
Thickness Much thinner 8 mm vs 21 mm 2.5x thinner
Camera resolution Significantly higher resolution camera 8 MP vs 2 MP Take photos with 4x more detail for larger prints
Network Significantly faster max data speeds HSDPA (21 mbps) vs EDGE (0.384 mbps) Higher theoretical max data transfer speeds over cell networks (more than 54.5x faster)
Bluetooth Newer bluetooth support 3.0 vs 2.0 Typically faster data transfer and lower power consumption connecting to other bluetooth devices
Internal storage More internal storage 16 GB vs 6 MB More than 2730.5x more internal storage, which means more music, photos and movies
Size Smaller 66×125×8 mm vs 46×100×21 mm Around 30% smaller
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen 800x480 vs 320x240 5x higher resolution screen
Talk time Slightly more talk time 8.6 hours vs 3 hours Around 3x more talk time per battery charge
Nokia 6280

Reasons to consider the 6280

3G
Numeric keypad Has a numeric keypad Physical numeric keypad vs None Almost the same
Standby time Slightly more standby time 10.4 days vs 7 days Around 50% more standby time, less frequent charging

Competitors

Common Pros and Cons

Compared to recent cellphones

Pros Cons
FM Radio Both have built-in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations
Listen to music from your favorite stations

We're not aware of any interesting cons shared by these two products.

Appearance

Samsung Galaxy S II Nokia 6280 Samsung Galaxy S II Samsung Galaxy S II

Comments

Which phone do you like, and why?

Showing 0 comments