Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V vs Samsung Galaxy Ace

Reasons to consider the Xperia neo V 3.5G, Google Android 2.3 (Gingerbread)
	Significantly higher PPI screen	263 PPI	vs	164 PPI	More than 60% crisper display of text, images and video
					More than 60% crisper display of text, images and video

	Higher resolution movies	720p @ 30fps	vs	320 x 240 @ 20fps	Shoots high resolution HD (720p) video at a higher frame rate


	Higher resolution screen	854x480	vs	480x320	More than 2.5x higher resolution screen
					More than 2.5x higher resolution screen

	Faster processor	Qualcomm Snapdragon, 1000 MHz	vs	Unknown, 800 MHz	More powerful processor, snappier and more responsive (around 30% faster)



Reasons to consider the Galaxy Ace 3.5G, Google Android 2.3 (Gingerbread)
	Significantly more talk time	11.2 hours	vs	6.9 hours	More than 60% more talk time per battery charge
					More than 60% more talk time per battery charge

	More standby time	26.7 days	vs	17.9 days	Around 50% more standby time, less frequent charging
					Around 50% more standby time, less frequent charging

	Slightly thinner	12 mm	vs	13 mm	More than 10% thinner
					More than 10% thinner

	Slightly lighter	113 g	vs	126 g	More than 10% lighter
					More than 10% lighter

	Slightly smaller	59x112x11 mm	vs	57x116x13 mm	Around 10% smaller
					Around 10% smaller

		Xperia neo V vs Xperia Arc S
		Xperia neo V vs Xperia ray
		Xperia neo V vs Xperia neo
		Xperia neo V vs Xperia neo L

		Galaxy Ace vs Galaxy Y
		Galaxy Ace vs GALAXY mini
		Galaxy Ace vs iPhone 4
		Galaxy Ace vs Galaxy S

Compared to recent cellphones

Pros

Cons

	Both support multi-touch
	Intuitive gestures such as pinch to zoom

	Capture very high resolution images
	5 MP

	Have assisted GPS
	Assisted GPS

	Both have fairly fast wifi support
	802.11n (150 mbps)

	Touch sensitive screens
	Easy to use with your fingers

	Works with many headphones
	1.0

	Many apps available at their app store(s)
	Android App Market

Thin

Xperia neo V:	13 mm
Galaxy Ace:	12 mm

	Both have an app store, makes it easy to add new games and programs
	Easily get games and programs for your phone

Long standby time

Xperia neo V:	17.9 days
Galaxy Ace:	26.7 days

	Neither has a numeric keypad
	Its often harder to dial numbers with a touch screen or keyboard

Compared to recent smartphones

Pros

Cons

	Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations
	Listen to music from your favorite stations

	Both include an accelerometer
	Detects movement for interactive apps

	Neither has a physical keyboard
	No keyboard

Less internal storage than average for storing music, photos and movies

Xperia neo V:	320 MB
Galaxy Ace:	158 MB

Which phone do you like, and why?

Showing 3 comments

Boyceavenue2578

(5:24 AM, April 08, 2012)

there is mismatch maybe Samsung Galaxy W vs Sony Ericson Neo V

Vickyisavailable4u

(1:17 PM, January 25, 2012)

I got Samsung galaxy ace its battery sucks whereas my friends neo has a long lasting battery than mine.

saurabhgureja

(10:10 AM, January 14, 2012)

It seems that no one has told the samsung fanboy who also the author of that comparison test (neo vs ace) that like galaxy ace, neo also supports Wi-Fi 802.11n network which supports approx. 300 Mbps of rated (theoretical, as advertised, another theory says it's 150 Mbps) bandwith that in real life will ultimately fail to run in this max speed performance.

11 Mbps - it's the theoretical peak bandwith of an 802.11b wireless connection.

*To the author of the comparison test: Xperia neo-V supports Wi-Fi b/g/n. Thanks.

Sony Xperia neo V vs Samsung Galaxy Ace

Reasons to consider the Xperia neo V

Reasons to consider the Galaxy Ace

Competitors

Common Pros and Cons

Compared to recent cellphones

Compared to recent smartphones

Appearance

Comments

Showing 3 comments