vs
Sony Xperia S Samsung Galaxy S II

Sony Xperia S vs Samsung Galaxy S II

Mobile speed test
Sony Xperia S

Reasons to consider the Xperia S

3.5G, Google Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen 1280x720 vs 800x480 Around 2.5x higher resolution screen
Screen PPI Much higher PPI screen 341 PPI vs 217 PPI Around 60% crisper display of text, images and video
Camera resolution Significantly higher resolution camera 12.1 MP vs 8 MP Take photos with more than 50% more detail for larger prints
Internal storage Significantly more internal storage 32 GB vs 16 GB 2x more internal storage, which means more music, photos and movies
Standby time Significantly more standby time 18.8 days vs 7 days More than 2.5x more standby time, less frequent charging
Processor Faster processor Unknown, 1500 MHz vs Unknown, 1200 MHz More powerful processor, snappier and more responsive (around 30% faster)
Samsung Galaxy S II

Reasons to consider the Galaxy S II

3.5G, Google Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
Screen type OLED screen Super AMOLED Plus vs TFT LCD The S II has a OLED screen, which are generally brighter and more vivid
Bluetooth Significantly newer bluetooth support 3.0 vs 2.1 Typically faster data transfer and lower power consumption connecting to other bluetooth devices
Network Faster max data speeds HSDPA (21 mbps) vs HSPA (14 mbps) Higher theoretical max data transfer speeds over cell networks (50% faster)
Weight Lighter 116 g vs 144 g Around 20% lighter
Thickness Thinner 8 mm vs 11 mm Around 20% thinner
Talk time More talk time 8.6 hours vs 7.5 hours More than 10% more talk time per battery charge
Size Slightly smaller 66x125x8 mm vs 64x128x10 mm Around 20% smaller

Competitors

Sony Xperia T Sony Xperia S Xperia S vs Xperia T
Sony Xperia P Sony Xperia S Xperia S vs Xperia P
Samsung Galaxy S III Quad Core - 32 GB - International edition Sony Xperia S Xperia S vs Galaxy S III
Sony Xperia SL Sony Xperia S Xperia S vs Xperia SL
Samsung Galaxy S II Apple iPhone 4 Galaxy S II vs iPhone 4
Samsung Galaxy S III mini Samsung Galaxy S II Galaxy S II vs Galaxy S III mini
Samsung Galaxy S II Plus Samsung Galaxy S II Galaxy S II vs Galaxy S II Plus
Samsung GALAXY Note Samsung Galaxy S II Galaxy S II vs Galaxy Note

Common Pros and Cons

Compared to recent cellphones

Pros Cons
Camera resolution Capture extremely high resolution images
Xperia S:12.1 MP
S II:8 MP
Movie format Both shoot high resolution HD movies
1080p @ 30fps
Internal storage More internal storage than most for storing music, photos and movies
Xperia S:32 GB
S II:16 GB
Screen resolution High resolution screens
Xperia S:1280x720
S II:800x480
Thickness Thin
Xperia S:11 mm
S II:8 mm
Multi-touch Both support multi-touch
Intuitive gestures such as pinch to zoom
GPS Have assisted GPS
Assisted GPS
Wifi Both have fairly fast wifi support
802.11n (150 mbps)
Processor Powerful processors, very snappy and responsive
Xperia S:Unknown, 1500 MHz
S II:Unknown, 1200 MHz
Touchscreen type Touch sensitive screens
Easy to use with your fingers
Network Fast data transfer
Xperia S:HSPA (14 mbps)
S II:HSDPA (21 mbps)
Screen PPI Sharp display of text, images and video
Xperia S:341 PPI
S II:217 PPI
compatibility-score Works with many headphones
1.0
App store Many apps available at their app store(s)
Android App Market
Screen size Large screens
4.3"
App store Both have an app store, makes it easy to add new games and programs
Easily get games and programs for your phone
Talk time Long talk time
Xperia S:7.5 hours
S II:8.6 hours
Numeric keypad Neither has a numeric keypad
Its often harder to dial numbers with a touch screen or keyboard

Compared to recent smartphones

Pros Cons
FM Radio Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations
Listen to music from your favorite stations
Accelerometer Both include an accelerometer
Detects movement for interactive apps
Keyboard Neither has a physical keyboard
No keyboard

Appearance

Sony Xperia S Samsung Galaxy S II Sony Xperia S Samsung Galaxy S II Samsung Galaxy S II

Comments

Which phone do you like, and why?

Showing 0 comments